Last one out of the Kinjaverse, turn out the lights.

Ghost in the Shell

Article on NYT: How Not to be Alone

"Technology celebrates connectedness, but encourages retreat. The phone didn’t make me avoid the human connection, but it did make ignoring her easier in that moment, and more likely, by comfortably encouraging me to forget my choice to do so. My daily use of technological communication has been shaping me into someone more likely to forget others. The flow of water carves rock, a little bit at a time. And our personhood is carved, too, by the flow of our habits."

"Most of our communication technologies began as diminished substitutes for an impossible activity. We couldn’t always see one another face to face, so the telephone made it possible to keep in touch at a distance. One is not always home, so the answering machine made a kind of interaction possible without the person being near his phone. Online communication originated as a substitute for telephonic communication, which was considered, for whatever reasons, too burdensome or inconvenient. And then texting, which facilitated yet faster, and more mobile, messaging. These inventions were not created to be improvements upon face-to-face communication, but a declension of acceptable, if diminished, substitutes for it."


My question after reading this article, is, where is the fine line for technology, where it brings us closer together, without eliminating our shared humanity? I remember when I used to have my friends' phone numbers memorized—now I can barely remember what month their birthday is in without Facebook. Is it possible for technology to straddle the line, or is the equilibrium never an optimal?

Share This Story